Skip to main content

Scientific Inquiry: Invention and Test



Hampl




Hempl, in this essay, considers Semmelweis’ work on childbed fever to illustrate some important aspects of scientific inquiry. Ignaz Semmelweis was a physician who did this work at the Vienna General Hospital from 1844 to 1848. As a member of the medical staff of the First Maternity Division in the hospital, he was worried to find that a large number of the women who were delivered of their babies in that division caught a serious illness known as childbed fever. The death rate of the mothers of the division was also very high. But in the Second Maternity Division of the same hospital, the death rate from the fever was much lower. 

Semmelweis wanted to solve the problem. He began by considering various explanations that were current at that time. One widely accepted view attributed the childbed fever to epidemic influences. But he questioned how such influences could affect the first division only. Finally, he noted that some of the women admitted to the first division had given birth in the street. He thought they were the cause of this disease. But despite these adverse conditions, the death rate from the fever among them was lower.


Some said overcrowding was a cause of mortality in the first division. But Semmelweis refuted the statement by pointing out that overcrowding was heavier in the second division.
In 1846, a commission that had been appointed to investigate the matter concluded that injuries resulting from rough examination by medical students caused illness to the first division. But Semmelweis countered this view saying that the injuries resulting naturally from the process of birth were much more extensive than those that might be caused by rough examination.

Various psychological views were attempted. One of them noted that the first division was so arranged that a priest bearing the last sacrament to a dying woman had to pass through five wards before reaching the sickroom beyond: the appearance of the priest was held to have a terrifying effect upon the patients in the wards and thus to make them more likely victims of childbed fever. Semmelweis tested this and proved false.

He observed that in the first division the women were delivered lying on their backs; in the second, on their sides. So, he introduced the use of the lateral position in the first division, but the mortality remained unaffected.

At last, the death circumstances of his colleague enabled him to conclude that his patients had died of blood poisoning. He with his colleagues and medical students would come to the wards directly from performing dissections in the autopsy room and examine the patients after only superficially washing their hands. He put his idea to test. He ordered all medical students to wash their hands in a solution of chlorinated lime before making an examination. As a result, the death rate from the fever began to decrease.

The hypothesis also explained the lower mortality among street births. The reason was that women who arrived with babies in arms were rarely examined after admission and thus had a better chance of escaping infection.

Semmelweis broadened his hypothesis after further clinical experiences. His broadened hypothesis was that childbed fever can be caused not only by cadaveric (=of corpses) material but also by foul matter derived from living organisms.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Then and Now: Finding My Voice

                                                                                                                       Elaine H. Kim, Korea Literal Comprehension “Then and Now: Finding My Voice” is written by Korean writer Elaine H. Kim, Korea. As she has come from Korea, she believes on fortune telling. Once she visited a popular fortune-teller to interpret her saju (horoscope), the arrangement of year, month, day and hour of birth. He said that her saju suggested disaster. On the other hand, women fortune- tellers looked at her saju and said she must have lots of fun in her life. Once, the Korean community center in Oakland sponsored a fund-raising party. Some fortune-tellers were also...

The Stub Book

Pedro Antonio de Alarcon Literal Comprehension  The story has been written by 19th-century Spanish writer Pedro Antonio de Alarcon. Uncle Buscabeatas was a farmer of Rota, a small town of Spain famous for the production of fruits and vegetables. He was already sixty years old and had spent forty of them working in his garden. He had grown some enormous pumpkins that were already beginning to turn yellow. He knew them perfectly by color, shape, and even by name. In one afternoon, he decided to sell forty of the pumpkins. But when he went to his garden the next morning, he found his pumpkins had stolen. He guessed that the thief must have taken them to the market of Cadiz. So he went to the Cadiz. He stopped before a vendor. After recognizing his pumpkins, he asked the policeman to arrest the vendor. After a brief argument between the farmer and the vendor, the latter said that he bought them from Uncle Fulano of Rota. When the inspector of the market asked the farmer fo...

King John and the Abbot of Canterbury

Anonymous, England (before 1665) Literal Comprehension: This is a story about King John of England and the Abbot of Canterbury. The rule of the king was not good, but the abbot was highly respected. So the King was jealous of him. He feared that the abbot was plotting against him. So the king called the abbot in his palace He threatened the abbot that he would be killed if he could not answer his three questions. The questions were: what was the king worth? How quickly could the king ride the whole world? And what did the king think at the moment? The questions were very deep. So, he asked for 15 days to answer them. The abbot went to Oxford and Cambridge Universities but could not find any wise person to answer him. At last, he went to his shepherd. The shepherd, disguising as the abbot, went to the king and answered all the questions. He replied to the king that Christ was sold for 30 pence and that he was worth 29 pence because he was 1 penny worse than Christ. In answer ...