Vincent Dethier
Literal Comprehension:
A properly conducted experiment is a beautiful thing. It is an adventure, exploration, and conquest. It commences with an act of faith, faith that that world is real, that our senses generally can be trusted, that effects have caused and that we can discover meaning by reason. The experiment is a way of asking nature good questions in different time and condition. The result is observed by changing condition and conclusion is drawn. But the wrong conclusion is drawn in the experiment due to the lack of proper experimental control, absurd extremities and confusing correlation with cause and effect. The writer has proved that many things can be discovered with the help of a properly conducted scientific experiment. On the other hand, improperly conducted experiments are ridiculous. To get the right conclusion is proposes of an experiment but getting experiment with animals is challenging. The writer here presents some information about the fly. Fly possesses a sense of taste in the feet. The sense is similar to human beings but the hungry fly is ten million times more sensitive than human beings. Fly prefers sweets and rejects sour, bitter or salty. By giving examples of water and sugared water, sugared water and salt water and water with more and less sugar, he says that the feet of the fly is more sensitive than the proboscis. Sensitive feet taste the food and flick out the proboscis if the food is sweet and retracts the proboscis if the food is bitter or sour or salty.
Interpretation:
In this scientific essay, Vincent Dethier discusses what real experiment is and how does wrong result come out in the experiment. The mistakes in an experiment he calls out fallacies. The proper experiment is undertaken with full faith in keeping the relationship between cause and effect,
random guesses and improper experiment create fallacies. Due to absurdity and lack of experimental control, the wrong conclusion is drawn. By discussing on the experiment, he gives proof about the fly, its sensitive power and preferences. He says fly prefers sweet. It takes a taste with feet which are 10 million times more sensitive than a human being.
Critical Thinking:
This essay is interesting and practical. By providing different examples, he tries to convince us what the experiment is and how does wrong result comes out from there. He gives some examples and information about the fly. As a critical thinker, I like to raise some questions in the text. Are there only foolish and cruel persons in the world? Why the writer does degrade us? Can we use the same saucer used by a fly? Are the flies really 10 million times more sensitive than mankind? Do the flies have a sense of taste on feet? Except for these points, I like this essay.
Assimilation:
This scientific essay tries to give us a practical lesson. Before reading it, I was unknown about how the wrong result comes out in a scientific experiment, how sensitive the animals and insects are? By reading the essay, I have come to know that animals are also respectable in their place. To be proud being a man is in vain. There are some animals and insects to which we have to respect. There are many things in nature to be learned by us.
Comments
Post a Comment